DENTAL XP Multimedia NoteBook SARAJEVO
Filipe Lopes
  1. Bone reconstruction

     

    A New Algorithm for the Implantologist

     

    Craig Misch

    2016

     

    DILEMMA

     

    Reconstruct to "ideal" ridge & gingival form

    Prosthesis replaces missing hard & soft tissues

     

    Build the ridge or build the bridge? Enrole the patient in the decision

     

    Minimize Morbidity - Maximize Results

     

     

    DEFECT MORPHOLOGY

    Vertical Augmentation in intra-bony defects, such as sockets or sinus is much easier than vertical extra-bony augmentation

    VERTICAL BONE AUGMENTION characterization is essential to establish difficulty

     

     

     

    COLOGNE CLASSIFICATION

    (6'40'')

    Orientation of the defect

    Augmentation needs

    Augmentation to defect relationship

    (inside the contour vs outside the contour)

     

    COLOGNE + SAC Classification 

    SAC

    (Straightforward Advanced Complex)

    Vertical & Combined defects are always advanced or complex

     

    DENTIST'S SKILLS & PATIENT'S HEALTH AND COMPLIANCE

     

     

     

    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS ON BONE AUGMENTATION

    We don't have the data to establish which technique or material works better.

     

     

    HORIZONTAL BONE AUGMENTATION

    GBR tends to grow less bone than a block graft.

     

    How much horizontal gain do I need?

    (14')

    Algorithm for horizontal augmentation

     

     

    TISSUE ENGINEERING TRIAD

    Signaling molecules

    Cells

    Scaffold

    With time & adequate environment leads to Bone Regeneration

     

     

    TITANIUM MESH

    Main reason to get exposure is inadequate free tension closure of the flap.

     

    Exposure leads to less bone volume augmentation.

     

    Early exposure (within 2 or 3 weeks after surgery).

    Late exposure (after 2 or 3 weeks).

     

    The search today is finding a resorbable scaffold.

     

    ALLOGENEIC BONE BLOCKS

    Slower turnover

    Growth factors, as BMP, can enhance its turnover

     

     

     

    VERTICAL BONE AUGMENTATION

    (28'39'')

     

    3 groups of vertical bone augmentation:

    (29'30'')

    5mm or less

    5-10mm

    more than 10mm

     

    POSTERIOR MANDIBLE

    Short implants vs Vertical augmentation

    Short implants: 8.5mm or less

     

     

     

     

    CROWN TO ROOT RATIO

    VS

    CROWN TO IMPLANT RATIO

    (33'57'')

     

    These ratio must be seen in different ways.

     

    Stress is highest on the crest of the ridge, at the neck of the implant.

    Increasing the implant length does not improve the crown to implant ratio.

    As long as the prosthetic crown stays within the confines of the implants there is no increase in the stress if the crown is higher. However if the crown is larger and falls out of the confines of the implant there will be an increase of stress.

     

    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

    High crowns

     

     

     

    DOES BONE AUGMENTATION IMPROVE RESULTS?

     

    No consensus of what is the better technique in vertical bone augmentation in the posterior mandible.

     

    Short implants

    vs

    Vertical augmentation

    Short implants less complications